U.S. and India discussed ongoing bilateral trade agreement negotiations and economic cooperation

True

Evidence from credible sources supports the statement as accurate. Learn more in Methodology.

Interesting: 0/0 • Support: 0/0Log in to vote

Confirmation (e.g., official readout or meeting record) that the two discussed ongoing bilateral trade agreement negotiations and expressed mutual interest in stronger economic cooperation.

Source summary
Secretary of State Rubio spoke with Indian External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar to exchange New Year greetings and discuss bilateral priorities. Rubio congratulated India on passing the "Sustainable Harnessing and Advancement of Nuclear Energy for Transforming India" bill and expressed interest in expanding U.S.-India civil nuclear cooperation, opportunities for American companies, energy security, and critical mineral supply chains. They also discussed ongoing U.S.-India trade negotiations and reaffirmed both countries' commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific.
Latest fact check

The official U.S. Department of State readout for January 13, 2026, on Secretary Rubio’s call with Indian External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar explicitly states that they "discussed ongoing bilateral trade agreement negotiations and their shared interest in strengthening economic cooperation." This directly matches the claim’s wording. Given that this comes from the primary government source describing the call, and there is no conflicting evidence from reputable outlets, the statement accurately reflects what the State Department reports was discussed. Therefore, the claim is accurate as written because it reproduces the official readout’s description of the conversation.

Timeline

  1. Update · Jan 14, 2026, 12:58 AMTrue
    The official U.S. Department of State readout for January 13, 2026, on Secretary Rubio’s call with Indian External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar explicitly states that they "discussed ongoing bilateral trade agreement negotiations and their shared interest in strengthening economic cooperation." This directly matches the claim’s wording. Given that this comes from the primary government source describing the call, and there is no conflicting evidence from reputable outlets, the statement accurately reflects what the State Department reports was discussed. Therefore, the claim is accurate as written because it reproduces the official readout’s description of the conversation.
  2. Original article · Jan 13, 2026

Comments

Only logged-in users can comment.
Loading…