Allies say repealing the Endangerment Finding will save taxpayers over $1.3 trillion

Unclear

Evidence is incomplete or still developing; a future update may resolve it. Learn more in Methodology.

Interesting: 0/0 • Support: 0/0Log in to vote

other

Aggregate federal and consumer cost reductions attributable to the repeal total at least $1.3 trillion as calculated by a verifiable independent or government analysis.

Source summary
The White House announced that President Trump directed the EPA to rescind the 2009 “Endangerment Finding,” which had been used as the legal basis for many greenhouse-gas rules. The administration and numerous industry and conservative organizations hailed the move as the largest deregulatory action in U.S. history, saying it will save about $1.3 trillion overall and roughly $2,400 per new vehicle. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin led the action; the article collects statements from supporters describing anticipated economic and consumer-choice benefits.
15 days
Next scheduled update: Mar 15, 2026
15 days

Timeline

  1. Scheduled follow-up · Mar 15, 2026
  2. Completion due · Mar 15, 2026
  3. Update · Feb 14, 2026, 06:26 AMin_progress
    Claim restatement: Officials and allies assert that the repeal is the single largest deregulatory action in U.S. history and will save taxpayers over $1.3 trillion. Evidence of progress: The administration publicly promotes the $1.3 trillion figure as part of its deregulatory push, but there is no published, verifiable independent or government analysis confirming the total. Current status and milestones: No formal completion date or final tally has been published that proves the aggregate cost reductions reach $1.3 trillion; coverage focuses on related regulatory rollbacks and broader fiscal debates rather than a verified accounting. Reliability note: The claim relies on White House communications with limited public corroboration from independent sources; absent a transparent, independent calculation, the figure remains unverified in public records as of 2026-02-13.
  4. Update · Feb 14, 2026, 04:13 AMin_progress
    Claim restatement: Officials and allies contend that the repeal of the Obama-era Endangerment Finding will save taxpayers more than $1.3 trillion and reduce vehicle costs, as announced by the White House on February 13, 2026. The core number is presented as a government estimate tied to removing federal greenhouse-gas standards linked to the Endangerment Finding (and all related vehicle regulations). The White House framing emphasizes consumer savings, lower prices, and a stronger economy as a result of this action (WH, 2026-02-13). Evidence of progress: The primary milestone to date is the public announcement of the repeal by EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin and the White House, positioning the Endangerment Finding revocation as the single largest deregulation action in U.S. history. News coverage and the White House transcript reiterate that the endangerment finding would be rescinded and that this would remove the basis for a broad suite of regulations, with EPA estimating over $1.3 trillion in savings and about $2,400 per new vehicle on average (CNBC, 2026-02-12; WH, 2026-02-13). Status relative to completion: There is no independent, post-action verification showing final, aggregate cost reductions have been realized across federal and consumer costs. The available material indicates the action has been announced and is undergoing regulatory adjustment, but concrete, realized savings across the economy would depend on subsequent rulemaking, litigation outcomes, and implementation of repeals, which remain in progress or subject to legal processes (CNBC, 2026-02-12; EPA/WH messaging, 2026-02-13). Dates and milestones: Key date is February 13, 2026, when the White House published the article announcing the repeal. CNBC reported on February 12, 2026, that the EPA endangerment finding repeal would likely impact wallet costs and cited the EPA’s estimate of $1.3 trillion in savings. No later completion date or firm target for final cost-accounting is provided; the process appears contingent on regulatory changes and potential court challenges (WH, 2026-02-13; CNBC, 2026-02-12). Reliability note: The White House and EPA-anchored messaging frame the $1.3 trillion figure as a government estimate driving consumer savings, which is echoed by mainstream outlets like CNBC. However, the analysis rests on models and cost assumptions about eliminating the Endangerment Finding and associated standards; independent, post-implementation verification is not yet publicly available, and potential court challenges or regulatory iterations could alter realized impacts. Given the political incentives surrounding deregulatory promises, cautious interpretation is warranted.
  5. Update · Feb 14, 2026, 02:49 AMcomplete
    Restatement of the claim: Officials and allies asserted that repealing the Obama-era Endangerment Finding would deliver more than $1.3 trillion in taxpayer savings. The White House framed the move as the largest deregulation action in U.S. history with broad consumer benefits. The administration tied the claim to regulatory relief and lower costs for consumers and businesses. Progress and evidence: The Administration announced the Endangerment Finding revocation, with formal materials detailing the economic impact. A key government document—the EPA fact sheet—quantifies savings, noting over $1.3 trillion in reductions from 2027 through 2055, including about $1.1 trillion from lower vehicle costs. Status of the promise: The action was completed in February 2026, with the Endangerment Finding rescinded and related emissions standards rolled back as described by EPA and White House communications. The EPA fact sheet presents the estimated savings over the horizon as the basis for the claim. Milestones and dates: February 12–13, 2026 mark the core milestones—EPA fact sheet release detailing economic impacts and the White House announcement of the deregulation move (EPA fact sheet, 2026-02-12; WH, 2026-02-13). The per-vehicle cost reduction is cited at roughly $2,400. Reliability and context: The principal savings figure comes from official government analysis (EPA) presented in an EPA fact sheet, lending strong reliability to the quantitative claim. Coverage from the White House and EPA aligns on the move and its estimated economic effects, though broader environmental policy debates persist. Incentives and interpretation: The EPA estimates frame the policy as reducing costs and expanding consumer choice, consistent with the administration’s deregulation narrative. Critics may foreground environmental considerations, but the official analysis directly supports the $1.3 trillion figure and provides milestones for verification.
  6. Original article · Feb 13, 2026

Comments

Only logged-in users can comment.
Loading…