Important News

Unemployment Insurance Weekly Claims Report

Interesting: 0/0 • Support: 0/0Log in to vote

Key takeaways

  • Seasonally adjusted initial claims for the week ending Dec. 20: 214,000 (down 10,000 from prior week).
  • 4‑week moving average of initial claims: 216,750 (down 750).
  • Seasonally adjusted insured unemployment (week ending Dec. 13): 1,923,000 (up 38,000); insured unemployment rate: 1.3%.
  • Unadjusted initial claims (week ending Dec. 20): 264,009, an increase of 8,832 (3.5%).
  • Total continued weeks claimed across all programs (week ending Dec. 6): 1,905,668, a decrease of 88,170 from prior week.
  • No state triggered "on" the Extended Benefits (EB) program during the week ending Dec. 6.
  • Largest state increases in initial claims (week ending Dec. 13): Rhode Island (+452), West Virginia (+325), Connecticut (+128); largest decreases: Illinois (-7,242), New York (-5,720), Pennsylvania (-5,129).

Follow Up Questions

What does "seasonally adjusted" mean and why does it matter for initial claims and insured unemployment?Expand

“Seasonally adjusted” means statisticians remove predictable calendar-related patterns (like holidays, school schedules, and weather-related slowdowns) from the raw weekly claims numbers. For unemployment insurance data, this matters because:

  • It lets you compare one week to the next without spikes from things like post‑holiday layoffs or summer factory shutdowns.
  • It makes the data a clearer signal of real changes in the labor market, so policymakers and analysts can see whether layoffs and benefit use are truly rising or falling, not just moving with the seasons. The Labor Department applies BLS‑produced seasonal factors each year to both initial claims and insured unemployment to produce these more comparable series.
What is the difference between "advance" claims (ETA-538) and the later revised claims (ETA-539)?Expand

“Advance” claims (ETA‑538) are the first, quick counts; ETA‑539 claims are the more complete, revised counts used for history and state detail.

  • ETA‑538: States report, within days, the number of initial and continued claims they directly took in the week, by liable state (the state that will pay the benefits). These are used to produce the national “advance” numbers in the weekly DOL news release and are not later revised in that advance series.
  • ETA‑539: The following week, states submit a fuller report that reallocates claims to the claimant’s state of residence and incorporates late reports or corrections. These ETA‑539 data are used for the final state‑by‑state tables, historical series, and Extended Benefits trigger calculations. Because the reporting basis (liable state vs residence and timing) differs, advance claims can differ slightly from the later ETA‑539 figures and are not strictly comparable to earlier weeks’ state data.
How is the "insured unemployment rate" calculated and what does it represent?Expand

The insured unemployment rate (IUR) is:

IUR = (Number of continued unemployment insurance claims) ÷ (Number of workers in jobs covered by unemployment insurance).

So it measures what share of workers in UI‑covered jobs are actually drawing benefits in a given week. It is narrower than the official unemployment rate (which counts all unemployed workers), because it only includes people who both lost a covered job and qualify for UI, but it is useful for tracking benefit usage and for triggering Extended Benefits in recessions.

What are the UCFE and UCX federal programs and who is eligible to file under them?Expand

UCFE and UCX are federal unemployment programs covering specific groups:

  • UCFE (Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees): Pays unemployment benefits to eligible former federal civilian employees. The program is federally funded but administered by state unemployment agencies under federal rules; claimants must meet the same basic monetary and job‑separation conditions as regular state UI, but based on their federal civilian wages.

  • UCX (Unemployment Compensation for Ex‑servicemembers): Pays unemployment benefits to eligible former members of the U.S. Armed Forces and the commissioned corps of NOAA. To qualify, the person must have served on active duty and been separated under honorable conditions, and then meet the state’s other UI eligibility rules. States again administer the claims as agents of the federal government; benefits are paid by the military branch (or NOAA), not via payroll deductions from servicemembers’ wages.

How does a state become "triggered on" for the Extended Benefits (EB) program?Expand

A state is “triggered on” for the federal–state Extended Benefits (EB) program when its unemployment measures cross specific thresholds set in federal law, and the state’s own law has that trigger in place. The default, mandatory trigger is based on the insured unemployment rate (IUR):

  • The 13‑week average IUR must be at least 5.0%, and
  • That 13‑week IUR must be at least 120% of the average IUR for the same 13‑week period in each of the prior two years.

States may also choose optional triggers:

  • IUR of at least 6.0%, regardless of prior‑year averages; or
  • A total unemployment rate (TUR) trigger: a 3‑month average TUR of at least 6.5% and 110% of the rate in one of the prior two years (yielding up to 13 EB weeks), rising to 8.0% and 110% for up to 20 EB weeks.

When a chosen trigger is met, EB turns on automatically in that state and provides additional weeks of UI to people who exhaust regular benefits; it turns off when the indicators fall back below the thresholds.

Why are advance state claims reported by the state liable for paying benefits rather than by the claimant's state of residence?Expand

Advance state claims are reported by the state liable for paying benefits rather than the claimant’s state of residence so that the early, national totals are timely and not double‑counted:

  • Many workers live in one state and work in another; UI benefits are paid by the liable state (where they worked), not necessarily where they live.
  • With more claimants filing interstate claims directly with the liable state, using the liable state as the reporting basis ensures all claims taken that week are captured once and only once for the advance estimate.
  • In the following week, states submit ETA‑539 data that reassign claims to the state of residence and incorporate any corrections; those revised figures are used for state‑by‑state comparisons and history.

So the liable‑state basis is a practical choice to get a fast, unduplicated national snapshot, which is then refined using residence‑based data.

Comments

Only logged-in users can comment.
Loading…