Breaking News

Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth Remarks to the Press

Interesting: 0/0 • Support: 0/0Log in to vote

Key takeaways

  • U.S. officials outlined a three-phase plan for Venezuela: stabilization, recovery, and transition.
  • Rubio stated the U.S. will take between 30 and 50 million barrels of Venezuelan oil that are stuck due to sanctions and a quarantine, and sell it at market rates.
  • Proceeds from the oil sales will be controlled by the U.S. in a way intended to benefit the Venezuelan people and avoid enriching the regime.
  • Two more ships/tankers were seized recently as part of the quarantine/enforcement effort; more seizures may follow and the military is prepared to continue enforcement.
  • Secretary Wright is said to be involved in running the oil portfolio and will provide further details; Rubio and Hegseth briefed Congress on classified aspects.
  • Rubio said he will meet with Danish officials next week to discuss Greenland and declined to discuss military intervention in detail, reiterating that the President retains military options globally.
  • Officials asserted the operation will not cost U.S. taxpayers money and argued deployed forces are already active worldwide.

Follow Up Questions

What specifically is PDVSA and what role does it play in Venezuela’s oil industry?Expand

PDVSA (Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A.) is Venezuela’s state‑owned oil and gas company. It was created when Venezuela nationalized its oil industry in 1976 and it controls most oil exploration, production, refining, and exports in the country, making it the central institution in Venezuela’s oil economy and the main source of government revenue.

Who are the “interim authorities” in Venezuela that Rubio references?Expand

Rubio’s reference to “interim authorities” follows the U.S. practice of recognizing an opposition‑led interim government in Venezuela. Since 2019, the U.S. has treated the National Assembly elected in 2015 and its chosen leadership (originally Juan Guaidó as interim president) as Venezuela’s legitimate governing authority, rather than Nicolás Maduro’s regime.

Under what legal authority is the U.S. seizing Venezuelan oil and ships?Expand

Public documents indicate the U.S. is relying on its sanctions and forfeiture powers to seize Venezuelan oil and ships: (1) presidential emergency powers under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and the National Emergencies Act, implemented via Venezuela‑related sanctions regulations; and (2) U.S. civil and criminal forfeiture statutes that let the government seize property involved in sanctions‑evasion, terrorism, narcotics, or other specified crimes, even when that property is oil or cargo on foreign‑flagged ships.

How exactly will proceeds from selling the seized oil be controlled and disbursed to benefit Venezuelan civilians?Expand

Rubio says only that the U.S. will “control how [the money] is disbursed in a way that benefits the Venezuelan people,” but he gives no details. Based on similar U.S. arrangements (for example, routing frozen Afghan central bank assets into a Swiss‑based trust managed by international trustees), this likely means the oil‑sale proceeds would be held in a U.S.- or foreign‑controlled fund and paid out for specific purposes (imports, humanitarian needs, or projects) rather than handed directly to Venezuela’s central government. However, the administration has not publicly provided a precise mechanism yet.

Who is Secretary Wright and which office is managing the oil portfolio mentioned by Rubio?Expand

“Secretary Wright” is Energy Secretary Chris Wright. News coverage indicates that the U.S. Department of Energy is leading the “oil portfolio” Rubio mentions—overseeing seizures, arranging sales of Venezuelan crude, and supervising how the resulting revenue is handled, in coordination with the State and Treasury Departments.

What does the administration mean by an oil “quarantine” in practical terms (how is it enforced)?Expand

In this context, an oil “quarantine” means a naval and law‑enforcement operation that stops, inspects, and can seize tankers carrying Venezuelan oil that violate U.S. sanctions. Hegseth says U.S. forces in the Caribbean are interdicting “stateless or sanctioned” vessels and that several tankers have already been taken. Practically, this resembles a limited maritime blockade focused on oil shipments: U.S. ships track suspect tankers, board them under sanctions or maritime‑law authorities, and prevent sanctioned Venezuelan crude from reaching buyers.

What is meant by a vessel being “sanctioned or stateless” under maritime law?Expand

A “sanctioned” vessel is a ship that has been formally designated under a sanctions program—its property is legally blocked, and U.S. persons must not deal with it. A “stateless” vessel is a ship that is not lawfully registered under any country’s flag, or that uses conflicting or false flag claims; under international law (e.g., Article 92 and 110 of the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea), such ships lose normal flag‑state protection and can be stopped, boarded, and even seized by any state because they have “no nationality.”

Has the administration provided a definitive answer about deploying ground troops in Venezuela (boots on the ground)?Expand

No. In the press exchange, Hegseth is asked directly, “Will there be boots on the ground?” and does not give a clear yes or no. Rubio separately repeats the standard line that the president “always retains the option” to use military force globally, including in Venezuela. The administration has deliberately kept the possibility of ground troops ambiguous rather than providing a definitive answer.

Comments

Only logged-in users can comment.
Loading…