Trump Visits Michigan to Highlight Auto Industry Sales, Investments, Tariffs and Regulatory Changes

Section 232 is a U.S. law that lets the president restrict imports (usually with extra tariffs) if the Commerce Department finds they threaten to "impair national security." For autos, Trump used Section 232 in 2025 to:

• Impose a 25% tariff on most imported medium‑ and heavy‑duty trucks and key truck parts, and a 10% tariff on imported buses, on top of normal duties.
• Keep earlier Section 232 tariffs on many imported passenger vehicles and auto parts in place.
  In practice, importers pay these extra duties at the border. Some relief is available if vehicles or parts have high U.S. content or are assembled in the U.S. (through offset credits and special rules for USMCA‑origin goods), but otherwise the tariffs raise the landed cost of affected imported vehicles and components.

Sources:

CAFE (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) standards are federal rules that set the average fuel‑efficiency (miles per gallon or equivalent) that each automaker’s fleet of new vehicles must meet. If an automaker’s fleet falls short, it normally pays civil penalties.

Under Trump in 2025, the administration:

• Issued a "reset" of CAFE that rolls back the tighter Biden‑era fuel‑economy path, lowering required efficiency levels for future model years (details are being implemented through DOT/EPA rulemakings).
• Backed legislation (the Working Families Tax Cuts Act) that sets the civil penalty for CAFE violations at $0, effectively removing financial fines for missing the targets.
• Framed this as making it easier to sell gasoline and diesel vehicles and avoiding what it calls a de‑facto EV mandate.

Sources:

The new auto‑loan interest deduction created by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act allows many buyers of new U.S‑assembled vehicles to deduct part of their car‑loan interest from taxable income. Key points from IRS guidance and proposed regulations:

• Time window: Applies to interest on loans originated after Dec. 31, 2024 and before Jan. 1, 2029 (available on tax returns for 2025–2028).
• Cap: Up to $10,000 per year of “qualified passenger vehicle loan interest” per taxpayer.
• Vehicle requirements: Must be a new passenger vehicle (car, SUV, pickup, van, minivan, or motorcycle under 14,000 lbs) bought for personal (non‑business) use, with final assembly in the United States. Buyers can use the VIN/NHTSA VIN decoder or the window sticker to verify U.S. final assembly.
• Who can claim: Individuals with eligible loans; the deduction is available whether they itemize or take the standard deduction. It phases out above about $100,000 modified AGI for single filers ($200,000 for joint filers).

In plain terms, “made‑in‑America” here means a new vehicle whose final assembly took place in the U.S., not necessarily that all parts are domestic.

Sources:

Public information on recent auto‑industry investment announcements under Trump’s second term shows large commitments, but it is often unclear how much is genuinely new spending versus repackaged or accelerated plans:

• Stellantis, for example, announced a US$13 billion U.S. investment in October 2025, saying it will add five new models and about 5,000 jobs over four years. Reporting notes this comes after earlier restructuring and investment plans, making it difficult to separate new money from previously planned capital spending.
• Similar ambiguity exists for other automakers’ U.S. announcements (Ford, GM, Toyota, Hyundai, etc.), which typically blend plant retooling, EV‑to‑ICE shifts, and previously announced projects.
• Most press releases give multi‑year timelines and estimated job additions but do not include binding job guarantees or penalties if hiring targets aren’t met; they are corporate commitments rather than legally enforceable obligations.

So far, independent analysts and company disclosures do not provide a clean breakdown of “new versus already planned” investment tied specifically to Trump’s 2025–26 policies.

Sources:

Independent data confirm that U.S. auto sales rose in 2025, but they do not clearly show that Trump’s Section 232 tariffs and regulatory rollbacks caused higher sales or lower prices:

• Industry statistics (NADA, S&P Global) show new light‑vehicle sales of about 16.2–16.3 million units in 2025, up ~2–2.4% from 2024 and the strongest since 2019, but still below pre‑pandemic peaks.
• Reuters and other outlets report that average transaction prices continued to rise in 2025 (around $47,000 in late 2025), driven by high interest rates and consumer preference for larger, costlier vehicles, despite tariffs and changing rules.
• Analyses of the 2025 CAFE “reset” suggest that weaker fuel‑economy rules may modestly lower vehicle technology costs but also raise fuel costs and emissions over time; independent experts generally do not find clear, immediate price cuts at the sticker level attributable to these changes alone.

Overall, independent evidence supports the sales rebound but finds mixed or limited proof that the new tariffs and rollbacks by themselves lowered consumer prices; other factors (interest rates, pent‑up demand, product mix) appear more influential.

Sources:

Rescinding state‑level EV mandates mainly refers to Trump and Congress using the Congressional Review Act in June 2025 to overturn California’s federal waivers that allowed it (and “follower” states) to require rapidly rising shares of zero‑emission vehicles (Advanced Clean Cars II, Advanced Clean Trucks, and related rules).

Practical effects, according to EPA, California, and independent coverage:

• EV mandates and stricter emissions standards in California and about a dozen other states are blocked unless new waivers or laws are adopted, reducing regulatory pressure to build and sell EVs in those markets.
• Automakers retain the ability to produce and sell EVs nationwide, but they face weaker regulatory requirements to do so and more fragmented standards, which analysts say could slow EV adoption relative to previous trajectories.
• Emissions: With less stringent ZEV sales and tailpipe rules in those states, projected fleet‑wide greenhouse‑gas and NOx reductions are smaller than under the Biden‑era waivers, increasing expected pollution and fuel use versus the prior policy baseline.

Sources:

Ford’s Rouge complex (Ford River Rouge Complex) in Dearborn, Michigan, is a historic, vertically integrated manufacturing site that has evolved into a modern truck and EV hub. Today it primarily includes:

• Dearborn Truck Plant: assembles Ford F‑150 pickup trucks (gasoline and hybrid variants).
• Rouge Electric Vehicle Center: has been used to build the F‑150 Lightning and is being retooled for Ford’s next‑generation electrified truck platform and related products.
  The broader complex also includes stamping, body, and other component operations, plus a visitor center and factory tour.

Sources: