Niche News

JIATF 401 publishes guidance on passive protections for critical infrastructure against drone threats

Interesting: 0/0 • Support: 0/0Log in to vote

Key takeaways

  • Joint Interagency Task Force 401 (JIATF 401) announced publication of a guidance document on Jan. 30, 2026.
  • The guidance is designed to help installation commanders and local law enforcement protect critical infrastructure.
  • The document emphasizes passive physical-protection measures to defend key assets from threats posed by drones.
  • The release and link to the document are posted on the Department of War's website (war.gov).

Follow Up Questions

What is Joint Interagency Task Force 401 (JIATF 401) and which agencies participate in it?Expand

JIATF-401 is a Department of War (DoW)–led joint interagency task force created to coordinate and deliver counter–small unmanned aircraft system (C‑sUAS) capabilities to defend U.S. forces, installations and critical infrastructure. It is jointly manned and brings together representatives from DoW services and dozens of federal partners; public reporting and DoD articles say the effort includes more than 50 federal agencies and interagency partners such as the Department of Homeland Security, FBI, Department of Transportation/FAA and other federal law‑enforcement and homeland‑security organizations.

Who are the "installation commanders" referenced in the guidance?Expand

“Installation commanders” are the senior commanders in charge of individual military installations (bases or posts). They are the local commanding officers responsible for installation security, force protection, and coordination with local civil authorities and law enforcement.

What exactly are "passive measures" for physical protection of infrastructure?Expand

Passive measures are non‑kinetic, non‑electronic physical protections—hardening and denial techniques—that reduce vulnerability without actively detecting or defeating drones. Examples include physical barriers, restricted‑access perimeters, hardened shelters, netting or covers for vulnerable assets, standoff distances, signage and improved site layout or shielding to limit damage if a drone or payload strikes.

Which specific types of critical infrastructure does the guidance cover (e.g., military bases, power plants, ports)?Expand

The guidance targets defense‑critical infrastructure associated with military installations and related assets—U.S. bases, installation facilities and nearby defense‑critical sites. Public summaries describe the document as aimed at installation commanders and local authorities to protect military facilities, assets and other critical infrastructure; the release does not list an exhaustive civilian sector list in the summary.

Is the guidance mandatory for installations and local law enforcement, or is it advisory/best-practice material?Expand

The JIATF‑401 publication is guidance/advisory material for installation commanders and local law enforcement—not a binding law. DoD/installation guidance typically consolidates policy and best practices and clarifies authorities, but whether a measure is mandatory depends on separate DoW/Service or federal statutes, regulations and local policies.

Where can the full guidance document be accessed and is it publicly downloadable?Expand

The War Department posted the release and a link to the guidance on the department website (war.gov). The public news release is at the War Department URL; the guidance document itself is linked from that release and has been summarized in DoW/press coverage. (If the DoW site blocks automated access, the release URL remains the official location.)

Does the guidance explain legal limits or privacy considerations for counter-drone measures?Expand

Public summaries say the guidance emphasizes passive physical protections and consolidates counter‑sUAS policy for installations; they do not fully reproduce legal or privacy analyses. Whether the document contains detailed legal limits, rules of engagement or privacy guidance is not stated in the public summary—those topics are normally covered in separate legal‑authority or service‑level policy documents—so the public summary alone is insufficient to confirm inclusion of comprehensive legal/privacy limits.

Comments

Only logged-in users can comment.
Loading…