Niche News

DHS Science and Technology Directorate outlines work to improve emergency communications, interoperability, and counter-jamming

Interesting: 0/0 • Support: 0/0Log in to vote

Key takeaways

  • S&T advises DHS on extending coverage in remote border and maritime areas, including evaluating direct-to-cell satellite solutions and planning 2026 tests for bandwidth, speed, and security.
  • S&T is developing an interoperability testing framework and validating push-to-talk smartphone apps to enable multi-agency voice, video, and data sharing during major events and incidents.
  • The directorate researches illegal jamming threats, tests system resiliency against jammers, develops mitigation solutions, and provides training to help operators identify and respond to radio frequency interference.
  • S&T participated in the Spectrum Cyclone exercise in Seattle to train DHS and state/local personnel ahead of the 2026 World Cup on detecting and mitigating interference and cyberattacks.
  • S&T is engaging in 5G/6G standards development to embed DHS resilience requirements early in the technology stack, from chipsets through network infrastructure.

Follow Up Questions

What is the Office for Interoperability and Compatibility and what specific role does it play inside S&T?Expand

The Office for Interoperability and Compatibility (OIC) is an S&T technology center that ensures first responders and DHS programs can exchange voice, video and data across any network. OIC develops interoperability requirements, standards coordination, R&D/testing and real‑world evaluations, validates nonproprietary capabilities for procurements, runs pilot projects, and advises S&T programs on resilient network solutions (e.g., small cells, FirstNet, private networks, satellite) to keep responders connected.

How does a direct-to-cell satellite solution work and what limitations should operators expect (cost, latency, bandwidth)?Expand

Direct‑to‑cell (D2C) satellites act like cellular base stations in space: an LEO satellite’s large phased‑array antennas receive/transmit signals from ordinary unmodified phones, relay them via gateways into a partner mobile operator’s network, and backhaul over inter‑satellite links or ground stations. Limitations operators should expect: higher per‑user/service cost and subscription/partnering fees; finite shared bandwidth and cell capacity (providers advertise tens to ~120 Mbps per space‑cell in commercial designs); increased propagation delay and Doppler effects (LEO adds tens of milliseconds and requires gateway compensation); device and spectrum compatibility and regulatory coordination; and lower aggregate capacity and higher per‑bit cost than dense terrestrial networks.

What technical standards govern push-to-talk interoperability and which agencies or vendors typically set them?Expand

Push‑to‑talk (PTT) interoperability is governed by standards and profiles built on cellular and land mobile radio standards (notably 3GPP standards for LTE/5G Mission‑Critical Push‑to‑Talk — MCPTT — and evolving NTN work), plus industry bodies and public‑safety forums that define operational profiles. Key standard authors/owners include 3GPP (MCPTT, Mission Critical Services), TIA/ETSI/IEEE for radio interfaces, and public‑safety stakeholders (SAFECOM, NPSTC); vendors (e.g., Motorola, L3Harris, AT&T/Verizon public‑safety solutions) implement and certify to those standards.

How can first responders recognize illegal jamming in the field and what immediate steps should they take?Expand

First responders can recognize illegal jamming by sudden simultaneous loss/degradation of multiple radio/ cellular signals in a localized area, intermittent or repeating loss patterns, unusually high noise floor on receivers, or alerts from RF monitoring tools. Immediate steps: move to a safe area (if possible), switch to alternate frequency bands or prebriefed backup channels/networks (e.g., FirstNet, encrypted talkgroups), enable known resilient modes (satellite/mesh radios or hardened PTT apps), report the incident to communications/technical leads and spectrum authorities (FCC/CISA/DHS), and use RF‑directional detection equipment or S&T/CISA guidance teams when trained to locate emitters.

What kinds of mitigation technologies does S&T test for counter-jamming (detection, location, signal filtering, backups)?Expand

S&T tests and evaluates multiple counter‑jamming technologies including detection systems (RF spectrum monitoring and anomaly detection), direction‑finding/location (triangulation/DF antennas), selective signal filtering and resilient waveforms, and redundant/back‑up paths (satellite links, private networks, mesh radios, FirstNet). Testing covers jammer resilience, mitigation algorithms, and operator training to identify and respond to interference.

How does S&T’s participation in 5G/6G standards translate into concrete procurement or operational changes for DHS Components?Expand

By engaging in 5G/6G standards work, S&T seeks to embed DHS resilience and interoperability requirements into early technical specifications (chipset, radio stack, core network, management APIs). Concretely this informs DHS Component procurement/specs (non‑proprietary, standards‑based requirements), guides vendor selection and test criteria (validated interoperability/resilience), supports pilot/demonstration buys, and yields operational guidance/configurations and test results Components can adopt for hardened 5G/6G deployments.

Comments

Only logged-in users can comment.
Loading…